The Many Faces of Freedom? Essay -- Expository Exemplification Essays

The Many Face of Freedom?Freedom is a concept that plurality are often willing to die for and it is the cause of much fighting. However, fewer people ever claim to dislike license. This raises an interesting question how bath people fight over what is generally considered to be a validatory idea? Does this mean that someone must be against granting immunity? The issue is that people sternnot agree on what freedom is, thus numerous groups can claim to be for freedom while strongly disagreeing on the office by which to achieve it. These groups often argue vehemently and passionately, trying to induce the majority that their side is right. However, emotion is only one part of decision making who is more than persuasive. I offer two examples of disagreements regarding freedom, as proof that freedom is neither tangible, nor a singular idea.An example of a disagreement more or little freedom in the midst of two larger groups is offered in Michael Rossmans account of a studen t protest in The hook up with Within the War. Feelings between students and the organization came to a head in an argument regarding tables set up by student organizations to meet new members and pass out information. The administration first restricted the students rights by forcing them to move the tables from the heart of campus to the edge of campus, unless from the majority of students. Then, a few years later, the students were told that they were not allowed to have the tables at all (102). Since their campus is a microcosm of the larger government of America, this limiting of their rights frightened them, cause them to react. As a result, they held a demonstration to make these concerns heard. Their main point, as presented in Catch-801 by Marvin Garson was that the University Administ... ...s to be a singular concept. The personal graphic symbol of an individuals definition of freedom is also the reason why the students were able to be more persuasive. Their writing c ontained a sense of personal concern, that decisions made regarding freedom would impact each one of them individually. In contrast, political speeches, although concerned more with the majority, spoke more in terms of abstract freedom, which is much less persuasive.Works Cited Garson, Marvin. Catch-801. Takin It to the Streets. New York. NY Oxford University Press, 1995. Reagan, Ronald. Freedom vs. Anarchy On Campus. Takin It to the Streets. New York. NY Oxford University Press, 1995. Rossman, Michael. The Wedding Within the War. Takin It to the Streets. New York. NY Oxford University Press, 1995. Roth, Philip. Goodbye, Columbus. New York. NY Bantam Books, 1968.